A fierce international debate has emerged over whether Israel's military campaign in Gaza should be labeled as 'genocide.' Scholars, journalists, and political leaders are divided, with some citing the scale of destruction, civilian deaths, and humanitarian crisis as evidence of genocidal intent, while others argue the term is being misapplied and politicized. The controversy is fueled by differing interpretations of international law, Israel's stated military objectives, and the historical context of both the Holocaust and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The debate has intensified as evidence of war crimes and humanitarian catastrophe mounts, prompting calls for accountability and stronger international intervention. This discourse reflects broader questions about moral responsibility, the power of language, and the global community's response to mass atrocities.
Бъдете първият, отговорил на тази Генерална дискусия .
